<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Thoughts</title>
	<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts</link>
	<description>Hello World</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Market Valuation Craziness by Life Insurance blog</title>
		<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=6#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Life Insurance blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=6#comment-68</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Learn facts about the life insurance industry&lt;/strong&gt;

Information on the life insurance industry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Learn facts about the life insurance industry</strong></p>
<p>Information on the life insurance industry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Orion/Ares is NOT the Space Shuttle by Adam J. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=41#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam J. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=41#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Yeah I'm not sure what the plan is here - if we're going to be committed to low earth orbit work due to the space station then they need something to fill that gap when they retire the shuttle.  I think we all can agree that the shuttle is a bit past its prime though.  Personally, I think they should scrap the space station and focus on long distance manned trips like an exploration of Mars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#8217;m not sure what the plan is here - if we&#8217;re going to be committed to low earth orbit work due to the space station then they need something to fill that gap when they retire the shuttle.  I think we all can agree that the shuttle is a bit past its prime though.  Personally, I think they should scrap the space station and focus on long distance manned trips like an exploration of Mars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The last GWB State of the Union by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=33#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=33#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Tax cuts without a budget cut are not a good thing for the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax cuts without a budget cut are not a good thing for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The last GWB State of the Union by Adam J. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=33#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam J. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=33#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Tax cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wikipedia by Operator</title>
		<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=28#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Operator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=28#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, that more should be done to control what is added to wikipedia.  You should have to post a reference with anything you add to a page. I gets frustrating when you go to a page and you see something that you know is false.  This story shows just how detrimental false additions can be: http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, that more should be done to control what is added to wikipedia.  You should have to post a reference with anything you add to a page. I gets frustrating when you go to a page and you see something that you know is false.  This story shows just how detrimental false additions can be: <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seriously, Reddit: Politics, Shut the fuck up by Waldo</title>
		<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=29#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=29#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hereâ€™s my real point, Reddit: IF YOU DONâ€™T HAVE ANY EVIDENCE TO BACK UP YOUR CONSPIRACY/WHINING/BULLSHIT POLITICAL CRAP, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Bloggers parroting a press release from the Pentagon is hardly evidence for your side either.  Especially when there is a vested interest to go to war with Iran.  The truth is that if you want to know what's going on, you have to be out in the field and not just cutting and pasting the latest in press releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hereâ€™s my real point, Reddit: IF YOU DONâ€™T HAVE ANY EVIDENCE TO BACK UP YOUR CONSPIRACY/WHINING/BULLSHIT POLITICAL CRAP, SHUT THE FUCK UP.</p>
<p>Bloggers parroting a press release from the Pentagon is hardly evidence for your side either.  Especially when there is a vested interest to go to war with Iran.  The truth is that if you want to know what&#8217;s going on, you have to be out in the field and not just cutting and pasting the latest in press releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Huckabee and Obama by Adam J. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=26#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam J. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=26#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I just don't see how Bloomberg would be anything but a spoiler - what states does he win?  Unless he sees a viable path to the 270 electoral votes I don't think he'd enter the race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see how Bloomberg would be anything but a spoiler - what states does he win?  Unless he sees a viable path to the 270 electoral votes I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;d enter the race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Market Valuation Craziness by glamour-agency</title>
		<link>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=6#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>glamour-agency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drhamad.net/thoughts/?p=6#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Studio Glamour&lt;/strong&gt;

hey great stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Studio Glamour</strong></p>
<p>hey great stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
