Make a deal, stick to it: Mother can’t renege on no-support deal
Friday, January 4th, 2008Sperm Donor Wins Child Support Battle: Mother can’t renege on payment deal, Pa. Supreme Court rules.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22488113/
In an age where the reproductive rights of a mother are hotbed political issues, and the rights of a father are ignored, it’s refreshing to see something like this. In short, if you make a deal with somebody you know (at least, in Pennsylvania) for them to donate sperm to you in order to have kids, and you agree that they’ll effectively not be the father (they don’t pay child support, and they have no right to visitation), then that’s it. They’re not the father. You can’t then go and renege and demand money.
Unfortunately, even this was decided in terms of the rights of a woman. The decision hinges on the fact that to decide any other way would be to destroy sperm donation system, which in turn would limit a woman’s “reproductive prerogatives.”
The state of the system today is simply unacceptable. Why is it that all we care about are the rights of the woman? To be clear, the result in this case was right and proper. But why was even this decided based on the rights of the woman, with the man ignored? This is ridiculous.
Just some food for thought.