Wikipedia
Monday, January 7th, 2008So, over the past couple weeks I’ve gotten into the whole Wikipedia editing experience. It’s… interesting, I’ll give it that much. It’s a pretty slick system, although a bit too complex for the average user. It has taken me this long just to learn the very basics. Regardless, I’ve pretty much exclusively (it has gone from 6k in size to 30k in size since I started editing) developed the Southbury article. No one has really interfered with me, or edited it since I started.
Until today. I go in today, and people have added things, made statements, changed things around - all without any discussion and often without any source. While I’m not saying any of it is wrong, I’m saying it’s annoying. I feel like I’ve done all this work, for free and really even without an acknowledgment - my name isn’t even on the page - and now people can just screw around with it. That annoys me. It makes me not really want to continue. I’d rather write the history & status of Southbury on this blog.
Wikipedia has discussion pages for a reason - people should use them, if they’re going to make edits. Even when I alone was working on it, I put a significant amount of stuff onto the discussion page, which not one other person has bothered to respond to.  Annoying.
Even worse, one of the users claims in his user page to be primarily responsible for the contributions to the article. This pisses me off to no end. But what can I do about it? Nothing, really. Sure I could delete it from his user page, but he could just re-add it. It needs to stop. Wikipedia is TOO open. There should be one person or group actually responsible for approving edits to each article, rather than everything being completely open.
But hey, what do I know, I’m only someone adding information to it.